U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Vol 1. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring.
Donabedian A. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
Quality and safety are ultimately determined by the degree to which health care improves important patient outcomes. However, documenting variations in morbidity and mortality is labor intensive. In this first volume, Donabedian develops the framework for measuring quality by assessing elements of structure or process with proven connections to key outcomes of interest. This framework may seem straightforward now, but only because Donabedian’s approach has become the paradigm for quality measurement in health care. Despite the wide dissemination of the structure-process-outcome triad, Donabedian’s original work remains worth reading. Those who wish to sample a briefer introduction can look at a review article by Donabedian in the
Journal of the American Medical Association
The quality of care: how can it be assessed?
Prevention of medication errors in the pediatric inpatient setting.
Stucky ER. Pediatrics. 2003;112:431-436.
Anesthesia safety: model or myth? A review of the published literature and analysis of current original data.
Lagasse RS. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1609-1617.
The bell curve.
Gawande A. The New Yorker. December 6, 2004;82-91.
Enhancing Patient Safety and Reducing Errors in Health Care.
Scheffler A, Zipperer LA, eds. Chicago, IL: National Patient Safety Foundation; 1999.
View all related resources...
Find Related Resources by...
Approach to Improving Safety
Error Reporting and Analysis
United States of America
Terms & Conditions
Produced for the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
team of editors
University of California, San Francisco
with guidance from a prominent
Technical Expert/Advisory Panel
. The AHRQ PSNet site was designed and implemented by Silverchair.